Showing posts with label military history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label military history. Show all posts

Thursday, August 14, 2025

The Battle of Isandlwana: Zulu War

 





The Battle of Isandlwana, fought on January 22, 1879, less than three years after Custer’s last stand at the Battle of the Little Bighorn, was one of the most catastrophic defeats in British military history.

 

On June 25, 1876, at the Battle of the Little Bighorn, five companies of the U.S. Seventh Cavalry, some 210 men, under the direct command of George Armstrong Custer were wiped out.  The results of the Battle of Isandlwana would be far worse.

The Anglo-Zulu War stemmed from British ambitions to confederate South Africa under their control. High Commissioner Sir Henry Bartle Frere, without explicit approval from London, issued an ultimatum to the Zulu king Cetshwayo on December 11, 1878, demanding the Zulu disband their 35,000–50,000-strong army, accept a British resident, and become a British client state.

When Cetshwayo refused, Lieutenant-General Lord Chelmsford, commanding British forces, launched an invasion with 16,500 troops, including 7,000 British regulars, African auxiliaries, and colonial volunteers, equipped with Martini-Henry rifles, artillery, and two Gatling guns.

The Zulus relied on their traditional "buffalo horns" formation—encircling enemies with flanking horns while the center engaged—using short stabbing spears, cowhide shields, and limited, outdated muskets.

Chelmsford’s divided his forces into three columns all converging on the Zulu capital, Ulundi. The central column, under his direct command, crossed the Buffalo River at Rorke’s Drift on January 11, 1879, and established a camp at Isandlwana, 10 miles into Zululand. The site, beneath the rocky outcrop of Isandlwana hill, was chosen for its open terrain but was left unfortified. Chelmsford underestimated the Zulu’s speed, intelligence network, and resolve, assuming their forces were far away and disorganized.

On the morning of January 22, Chelmsford split his force, taking 2,500 men to scout for the Zulu army.  The camp now housed about 1,700 men, including 900 British regulars, 400 colonial troops, and 400 African auxiliaries, under the command of Colonel Henry Pulleine.  Unbeknownst to Chelmsford, a Zulu army of 25,000 warriors was closing in.

 Colonel Anthony Durnford arrived with 500 mounted troops to reinforce the position but, acting on a scout’s report, led a detachment to pursue a supposed Zulu retreat.

Around 8 a.m., a British scouting party stumbled upon the Zulu army concealed in a valley 5 miles east. The Zulus, initially resting, sprang into action, launching a coordinated assault by 10:30 a.m. Their buffalo horns formation unfolded with devastating precision: the left horn swept around the British right flank, the right horn targeted the left, and the central “chest” pressed forward. Pulleine deployed his troops in an extended firing line to maximize their Martini-Henry rifles’ range, but the line was too thin, stretching over a mile. The Zulu advance, moving at a disciplined jog, absorbed heavy casualties but closed the distance rapidly, exploiting the open terrain.

By noon, the situation deteriorated. Durnford’s detachment, returning from their pursuit, was cut off by the Zulu left horn and overwhelmed; Durnford was killed. The British line, hampered by the too slow dispersal of reserve ammunition during the fight began to buckle. Zulu warriors infiltrated gaps, targeting tents and wagons, disrupting resupply efforts. The Zulu horns completed their encirclement, and hand-to-hand combat ensued. The British, trained for disciplined volleys, were ill-prepared for the Zulus’ close-quarters ferocity. By 2 p.m., the camp was overrun. Pulleine, realizing defeat, reportedly handed the regimental colors to a lieutenant for safekeeping before being killed. Of the 1,700 defenders, over 1,300 perished, including 52 officers, 727 British regulars, 471 African and colonial troops, and others. Zulu losses were heavy—estimated at 1,000–2,000 killed—but they captured 1,000 rifles, two cannons, and vast ammunition stores.



A Rifleman in Normandy



History's Ten Worst Generals


Friday, June 24, 2016

Who Was the Worst General in History?


Success leaves clues.  So does failure.  Some of history’s best known commanders are remembered not for their brilliant victories but for their catastrophic blunders.  Here are history’s ten worst generals (in no particular order). 

1.     John Armstrong Jr.’s incompetence was responsible for the burning of Washington during the War of 1812.

2.     Oreste Baratieri was an Italian general responsible for the most crushing defeat ever suffered by a colonial European power by native forces in Africa.

3.     Edward Braddock’s army made so much noise the enemy always knew where he was, but Braddock didn’t have a clue where the enemy was until he was ambushed.

4.     Roman General Marcus Crassus stood his ground and hoped the enemy would run out of arrows before he ran out of men.  They didn’t.

5.     George Armstrong Custer announced to his men, “We’ve caught them napping!”, just before suffering the most stunning defeat of the Indian Wars.

6.     British Major General William Elphinstone is considered by some military historians to be “the most incompetent soldier who ever became a general”, possessed of “the leadership qualities of a sheep.”

7.     Brigadier General William Hull is the only American general to have ever been sentenced to death by a court-martial.

8.     Francisco Solano Lopez was responsible for the deaths of half of his fellow countrymen.

9.     Sir Charles MacCarthy forgot to take the ammunition and wound up having his skull used as a drinking cup at the annual Yam Festival.

10.  Alexander Samsonov didn’t feed the troops and ended up shooting himself on the battlefield.


History's Ten Worst Generals

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

History's Worst Generals

Success leaves clues.  So does failure.  Some of history’s best known commanders are remembered not for their brilliant victories but for their catastrophic blunders. 

Throughout the centuries countless armies have gone down to defeat, succumbing to greater numbers, more advanced technology, or more skilled opponents.  A few armies have been defeated because of the blundering incompetence of their own commanders.  What are the elements of leadership failure?  A recurrent pattern emerges over the last two thousand plus years. 







The best reading experience on your Android phone or tablet, iPad, iPhone, Mac, Windows 8 PC or tablet, BlackBerry, or Windows Phone.