Authority over the family was legally vested in men, which profoundly influenced a woman's ability to control property, dissolve her marriage or insure custody of her children (there were fewer than 10,000 divorces a year in 1861). A woman's right to own property emerged slowly. Mississippi passed the first Married Women's Property Act in 1839. In 1845 Massachusetts passed similar legislation, with New York following suit in 1848. In 1855, Massachusetts far in advance of the rest of the Union, legislated to protect the wages of working married women, which were at that time, the legal property of her husband.
Laws concerning divorce varied widely among
the states throughout much of American history. In New England, where the
Puritans had defined marriage as a civil contract rather than a religious sacrament,
secular law had provided for divorce as early as the 17th century. Like any
other contract, the marriage bond could be broken when either of the
contracting parties failed to meet the obligations it imposed. Adultery,
impotence, desertion, or conviction for serious crimes, were all grounds for
divorce. Additionally, wives could obtain a divorce on the grounds of
non-support.
In most
states in the early 19th century, an act of the legislature was required to end
a marriage. As the century progressed divorce laws became more liberal. During
the 1850s, Indiana was widely condemned for its liberal ways. A couple in
Indiana could obtain a divorce on any grounds that a judge ruled “proper”.
Indiana judges were far more permissive than the New York City judge who in
1861 refused to grant a divorce to a wife whose husband had beaten her
unconscious in an argument over letting the family dog sleep on the bed. The
judge advised the woman that “one or two acts of cruel treatment” were not
proper grounds for divorce. Indiana’s liberal stance on divorce attracted a
flood of applicants from other states. The influential newspaper editor and
future presidential nominee, Horace Greeley denounced Indiana as “the paradise
of free-lovers” whose example would soon lead to “a general profligacy and
corruption such as this country has never known.”
No comments:
Post a Comment