Sioux representation of the Battle of the Little Bighorn
In his book, A Terrible Glory: Custer and
the Little Bighorn - the Last Great Battle of the American West, James Donovan
details some of the glaring inadequacies of the Seventh Cavalry as a fighting
force at the Battle of the Little Bighorn.
Donovan states that the relative merits of Custer’s, Reno’s and
Benteen’s military judgments cannot be properly understood without an
understanding of these inadequacies.
The frontier army was small, ill-trained and badly
equipped by a miserly Congress. The quality of the troops was appalling, “only
the malingerers, the bounty-jumpers, the draft-sneaks and the worthless
remained” in the army after the Civil War.
“These, with the scum of the cities and frontier settlements,
constituted more than half the rank and file on the plains.” (Donovan, 37) Donovan continues, “Training in marksmanship,
horsemanship, skirmishing, any practical lessons that Indian fighting might
actually involve, was virtually nonexistent.
Formal military training of recruits consisted mostly of elementary
drill aimed at making a grand appearance at dress parade.” (Donovan, 121)
On June 25, 1876, the actual day of
battle, the five companies that Custer took with him to personally administer the
coup de grace to the Sioux were inadequately led. “Company C was led by Second Lieutenant Henry
Harrington, who had no combat experience…. F Company was led by Second
Lieutenant William Van Wyck Reily, who had been in the army less than eight
months and had only recently mastered the fundamentals of horsemanship.”
Donovan continues, “Of the thirty sergeants authorized to the five companies,
fully half were absent, either with the pack train or on detached duty.”
(Donovan, 218-219)
Custer over-estimated the offensive
capabilities of the Seventh Cavalry.
When Custer finally viewed the village in its vastness, the view revealed
the daunting size of the task required for victory, “…on the other side of the
river were thousands of Indians, probably women, children, and older men,
streaming into the hills and ravines….Custer had corralled only fifty-three of
them on the Washita….” (Donovan, 267)
Since his death along the bluffs
overlooking the Little Bighorn River, in Montana, on June 25, 1876, over five
hundred books have been written about the life and career of George Armstrong
Custer. Views of Custer have changed over succeeding generations. Custer has
been portrayed as a callous egotist, a bungling egomaniac, a genocidal war
criminal, and the puppet of faceless forces. For almost one hundred and fifty
years, Custer has been a Rorschach test of American social and personal values.
Whatever else George Armstrong Custer may or may not have been, even in the
twenty-first century, he remains the great lightning rod of American history.
This book presents portraits of Custer and the Battle of the Little Bighorn as
they have appeared in print over successive decades and in the process
demonstrates the evolution of American values and priorities.
No comments:
Post a Comment